Användare: Brendhain

I see you still provide NO Sources that support you. I have been in the internet long enough to learn that when someone refuses to read the source material I provide them which shows them to be wrong AND refuse to provide any sources supporting their own position than they likely don’t know much at all about the subject. Since you believe you understand English better than I do (as you repeatedly wrote I misunderstood the studies I read), then I will feel free to write in English Try actually reading the entire study of Swedish kommun’s attempts and some of the other sources/källor. If you did this then you would know what you have written that is wrong. Here is a short list of some of your erroneous claims that the article refutes: Växter blir inte större av att bekämpas, det är dumheter. ”Större” is a bit ambiguous. It usually react by expanding outward, thus a större områden. ”Eller egentligen när den återställt balansen _ _ _ Det optimala är att rensa när